e-ISSN: 2776-1207 p-ISSN: 2776-1215
Login • Register

CRITICAL THINKING IN THE DIGITAL ERA: THE STRATEGIC ROLE OF COMPUTATIONAL THINKING IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Full-Text & Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): JLCEdu (Journal of Learning and Character Education)
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): JLCEdu (Journal of Learning and Character Education)
PDF Open Access (Full-Text)
Publication Details
CC BY 4.0
© 2025 Trisnawati Trisnawati, Ari Wibowo, Muhammad Idris. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors

Trisnawati Trisnawati
Prodi Sistem Informasi, Institut Bakti Nusantara, Lampung
Ari Wibowo
Prodi Manajemen Bisnis Syariah, STEBI LIWA, Lampung
Muhammad Idris
Prodi Manajeman Pendidikan Islam, STIT Pringsewu, Lampung

Keywords

Computational Thinking, critical thinking, higher education, collaborative learning, digital curriculum

Abstract

This study aims to examine the strategic role of Computational Thinking (CT) in strengthening university students' critical thinking skills in the digital era. CT is understood as a systematic thinking approach that includes decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithms for solving complex problems. The research employed a descriptive qualitative method, with data collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. Participants consisted of lecturers and students from a public university that has implemented CT-based learning strategies. The findings indicate that CT contributes positively to enhancing students' critical thinking abilities, particularly in problem analysis, logical argument construction, information evaluation, and decision-making. CT is most effective when applied through collaborative and project-based learning, supported by clear instructional design. Challenges include limited CT literacy among non-technical students and insufficient lecturer preparedness. The study recommends curriculum development and pedagogical training to support interdisciplinary CT integration in higher education.

 

References

18
1
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K–6 CT curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47–57.
2
Chan, M. Y., Liu, Z., & Soh, K. (2025). From Programming to Prompting: Developing CT Through Large Language Model-Based Generative Artificial Intelligence. TechTrends, 69(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01052-6
3
Chen, W., Zhang, Y., & Liang, X. (2023). Effects of the Interaction Between Metacognition Teaching and Students’ CT Skills on Learning Outcomes in a Collaborative Programming Environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4873–4890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11671-2
4
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). CT in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.
6
Jeannette, W. (2006). CT. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
7
Kalelioglu, F., Gülbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A framework for CT based on a systematic research review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 583–596.
8
Khine, M. S., Ali, H. M., & Afari, E. (2022). Integrating STEAM Education and CT: Analysis of Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Skills in an Innovative Teaching and Learning Environment. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v11n1p13
9
Lee, Y., & Kang, M. (2022). Research on the Impacts of Cognitive Style and CT on College Students in a Visual Artificial Intelligence Course. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 864416. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864416
10
Liu, J., Pan, Y., & Zheng, C. (2021). Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Through CT: Evidence from a Problem-Solving Intervention. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(5), 923–943.
11
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
13
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
14
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
15
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2021). Demystifying CT. Educational Research Review, 32, 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100364
16
World Bank. (2022). World Development Report 2022: Digital Transformation for Inclusive Development. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
17
World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023. Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023
18
Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2021). Interventions to Develop CT: A Systematic Literature Review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(4), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446874
Full-Text & Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): JLCEdu (Journal of Learning and Character Education)
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): JLCEdu (Journal of Learning and Character Education)
PDF Open Access (Full-Text)
Publication Details
CC BY 4.0
© 2025 Trisnawati Trisnawati, Ari Wibowo, Muhammad Idris. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.